[2015] FWC 7557
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Andrew Millis
v
WesTrac Cat Pty Ltd T/A WesTrac
(U2015/13208)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 4 NOVEMBER 2015

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] Mr Andrew Millis was employed by WesTrac Cat Pty Ltd until his employment was terminated on 8 September 2015. WesTrac objected to Mr Millis’s application because it said he earned more than the high income threshold.

[2] Mr Millis was employed as a Human Resources Business Partner.

[3] Mr Millis submitted that his work was covered by the Miscellaneous Award 2010 or the Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010.

[4] At the hearing, Mr Millis did not press that he was covered by the Vehicle Award.

[5] Section 48 of the Fair Work Act 2009 makes it clear that:

[6] The Miscellaneous Award provides as follows at clause 4:

[7] Clauses 4.2 - 4.6 have no application.

[8] Schedule B provides for the classification structure and definitions:

[9] WesTrac provided a description for a Human Resources Business Manager position which provided that the minimum qualification was a tertiary qualification. Mr Millis has degree qualifications. Mr Millis said that he had not been provided with the position description and he disputed that the position description tendered by WesTrac accurately reflected the work he performed. He accepted that he had a HR adviser and recruiter report to him. Mr Millis submitted that he was not a decision maker and was only able to make recommendations to more senior management. He said he performed administrative functions.

[10] I am not satisfied that the Miscellaneous Award does not cover Mr Millis’ employment. I am not satisfied that he was a sub-professional employee. I am satisfied that the position of Human Resources Business Partner is the type of position excluded from coverage in the Miscellaneous Award.

[11] The question then to be determined is whether Mr Millis earned more than the high income threshold of $136,700.

[12] Mr Millis accepted that his guaranteed base salary was $138,000. He submitted that because he had only worked for seven months his annual salary had not exceeded the high income threshold.

[13] It is clear that the calculation of a person’s annual rate of earnings is to be determined at the date of termination. It is clear that the amount is not determined by calculating the amount the employee earned in the twelve months prior to termination, except as provided by the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

[14] In this matter, Mr Millis’ annual rate of earnings was a minimum of $138,000. As this exceeds the high income threshold, Mr Millis was not protected from unfair dismissal and his application must be dismissed.

al of FWC and Gooley DP signature

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

A. Mills on his own behalf.

B. Stocks for the Respondent.

Hearing details:

2015.

Melbourne and Perth, by telephone link:

October 28.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR573557>