Epiq logo Fair Work Commission logo

 

 

 

 

 

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Fair Work Act 2009                                                    

 

VICE PRESIDENT HATCHER

 

 

AM2021/78

 

s.160 - Application to vary a modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty or correct error

Application by Australian Entertainment Industry Association T/A Live Performance Australia

(AM2021/78)

Live Performance Award 2020

Sydney

 

10.15 AM, MONDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2021


PN1             

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Hello, I’ll take the appearances.

PN2             

Mr Hamilton and Ms Minster, you appear for Live Performance Australia.

PN3             

MR D HAMILTON:  That’s correct, your Honour.

PN4             

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  And Ms Wilson, you appear for the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance?

PN5             

MS M WILSON:  That is correct, your Honour.

PN6             

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN7             

Well, I’ve perused the application, and I’ve seen the correspondence from MEA, which suggests a conciliation.

PN8             

What do you think is the best path forward, Mr Hamilton?

PN9             

MR HAMILTON:  We’re open to that, your Honour.  The application really is just to seek guidance from the Commission as to the correct payment for casual employees, it’s not an application to vary, per se.  It’s just that the Fair Work Ombudsman had a particular view, which was contrary to our view, and therefore, we just sought to make sure that our members were paying the correct amount for casual employees, and public holidays, and other parts of the Award.

PN10          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yes, Mr Hamilton.

PN11          

Well, I mean, we can't give an interpretation of the Award as such.  What we can do is vary the Award to the extent that the existing provisions create any doubt, we can remove that doubt.  That would require us, firstly, to form a conclusion about what the Award is intended to mean, and then, secondly, draft some variations, which make it clear, that the Award says what it’s intended to mean.

PN12          

So you have a view about what it is meant to mean, do I understand you to have any disagreement as to the intended meaning between you and any other party, in particular, MEA.

PN13          

MR HAMILTON:  No.

PN14          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Have you (indistinct)10.17.10 with MEA about this issue?

PN15          

MR HAMILTON:  We’ve had preliminary discussion, your Honour.  And Ms Wilson was reading the papers, I don't know what their particular position is, but I don't think that they’re arguing about what the intent of the Award is.  But I’ll let Ms Wilson provide their position.

PN16          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN17          

Ms Wilson, what do you want to say about it?

PN18          

MS WILSON:  Well, we hadn’t actually considered the Ombudsman’s interpretation of the Award, but having heard that, we want to just eliminate doubt as to which is the correct one, correct interpretation, and that’s why we thought a little bit of - at least a little bit, or maybe more, of conciliation might be helpful, to just thrash out, you know, what everybody thinks the interpretation should be, and how it’s actually interpreted in the real world.

PN19          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  So do I take that to mean that MEA hasn’t actually turned its collective mind to the problem yet?

PN20          

MS WILSON:  Correct.

PN21          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Well, I mean, I’m not sure it’s useful to hold a conciliation till the parties have actually analysed the problem and worked out a position.

PN22          

How long might it take you to do that?

PN23          

MS WILSON:  Well, look, I - really, I think we just need to talk to the to her side, because we had seen it as being fairly straightforward, and now there’s this sort of alternative interpretation by the Fair Work Ombudsman, which would be much more advantageous to our members.

PN24          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yes.

PN25          

MS WILSON:  And so we don’t necessarily want to throw the baby out with the bath water but saying that that’s absolutely ridiculous.  Because it is, you know, an interpretation, I just do whether it’s the correct one.

PN26          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN27          

Well, again, how long might you need to consider, or your organisation to consider its position, and perhaps hold discussions with the applicant?

PN28          

MS WILSON:  We could probably do that within two weeks, I would think.

PN29          

Mr Hamilton, would you agree with that?

PN30          

MR HAMILTON:  Yes.

PN31          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN32          

Well, why don’t I do this?  Why don’t I set the matter down for a further directions hearing on 1 November.  I’m sorry, I can do it sooner than that.  On 26 October, and if the parties advise me beforehand that it would be useful to do so, I can turn that into a directions and conciliation conference.

PN33          

Would that be an appropriate course forward?

PN34          

MS WILSON:  That would be very helpful, your Honour.

PN35          

MR HAMILTON:  That’s fine, your Honour.

PN36          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN37          

Well, I’ll adjourn on that basis.  That the parties are directed to confer, and I’ll make it a report back and on request, conciliation conference to be held at 9 am on 26 October.

PN38          

MS WILSON:  Thank you, your Honour.

PN39          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN40          

MR HAMILTON:  Thank you.

PN41          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Anything further I can do today?

PN42          

MS WILSON:  Not from the Union.

PN43          

THE VICE PRESIDENT:  All right.

PN44          

Thanks for your attendance.

PN45          

MS WILSON:  Thank you.

PN46          

MR HAMILTON:  Thank you, your Honour.

ADJOURNED UNTIL TUESDAY, 26 OCTOBER 2021         [10.20 AM]