Previous PageNext Page

AN140296 – Teachers' Award - Non-Governmental Schools 2003

SCHEDULE 2

Advanced Skills Teacher - Level 1 (AST1)

Selection Criteria Guidelines

(1) GRAMMAR SCHOOLS AND OTHER SCHOOLS NOT SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE 2

(A) General Criteria

(These should be read in conjunction with the specific criteria for AST1)

The evaluation in clause 5.4 of the Award will be provided with selection guidelines outlined in this Schedule to ensure consistency in the interpretation of the selection criteria.

(i) Commitment to the ideals and objectives of the non-government school sector and the employing authority-

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall show:

(ii) Skills in effective classroom teaching practices and in reporting and evaluating student progress-

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

(iii) Very positive relationships with students and their classes, and effective communication skills when collaborating with parents and other Teachers -

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

(iv) Ability to develop ideas gained from their own teaching practice and to apply ideas gained from professional development activities to enhance students' learning -

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

(v) Knowledge of current issues-

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

(vi) Contribution to the effective development, implementation and evaluation of programs within the school-

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

(vii) Access to the 3 AST levels will in general terms, be based on multiple pathways, criterion referenced but with a caveat that the evaluation panel would need to be satisfied that the skills proposed by the applicant are the "skills in use" -

Years of experience, professional development and involvement in the whole school's process may be a substantive part of consideration by the panel of the applicant's eligibility.

As well, the criteria outlined should be directly related to classroom teaching and experience.

Building on the provision for a Teacher's portfolio (clause 9.3 of the Award) the portfolio would reflect all aspects of the general criteria referred to above and to the more detailed criteria below.

The portfolio would contain if necessary, written references and detailed evidence of the achievement and demonstrate specific skill criteria.

(B) Specific Criteria

(These must be read in conjunction with the General Criteria guidelines)

An AST1 Teacher must be able to demonstrate the capacity to meet the following criteria of which (i) to (v) are mandatory:

(2) QUEENSLAND CATHOLIC EDUCATION EMPLOYING AUTHORITIES

(A) Appointment Process.

A Validation Panel will be established at the school level.

The Validation Panel shall consist of:

The role of the Validation Panel is to evaluate, in accordance with the Guidelines for Validation Panels as agreed between the parties, the supporting evidence produced by an applicant for an AST1 and to make a recommendation based on that evidence to the Employing Authority.

Agreed guidelines exist for both Panel members and applicants. A copy of these guidelines will be provided by the Employing Authority on request.

Appropriate in-service training shall be provided to both Panel members and applicants as required.

Where the Validation Panel recommendation is to not appoint an applicant to an AST1 the applicant is to be advised in writing of the recommendation and those selection criteria not satisfied by the application.

(B) Selection Criteria

A Teacher applying for an AST1 classification shall, to the satisfaction of the Validation Panel, demonstrate advanced skills in all 5 of the general criteria, and specifically the performance indicators detailed for each criteria, as listed in clause (C).

An applicant shall be considered to have substantially satisfied the general criteria when evidence is produced relating to the specified performance indicators. The panel must be satisfied that the overall level of attainment in respect of each group of performance indicators, taken together as a whole, satisfies the standard and purpose of the general criteria consistent with the definition of AST contained in this Award.

Failure to address all specified performance indicators will not of itself prevent an applicant from satisfying the general criteria and being recommended for the AST1 level. Factors such as:

may be taken into account by panels when evaluating applications.

The measure of attainment for AST1 is 'exemplary'. Therefore the applicant's performance in relation to the criteria/indicators will be a model for other Teachers, will set a high standard and will place the applicant within the upper ranks of the profession.

The criteria shall be understood within the framework of the values and ethos of the school/system and shall be evidenced by meeting the performance indicators through substantial and sustained performance.

As at 5 March 1996, the general selection criteria apply to the AST1 level. In relation to determination of AST2 and AST3 the same general selection criteria shall apply and further general selection criteria and/or specific performance indicators shall be negotiated by the parties and submitted to the Commission for inclusion in this schedule.

(C) Criteria and performance Indicators.

The general selection criteria and specific performance indicators are listed below.

(D) Appraisal Process

Exemplary performance is an integral part of the AST programme and the formative appraisal process supports this. During the period of tenure as an AST1, the Teacher will be subject to a formative appraisal process as outlined in clause 2 (D) of Schedule 2.

It is the goal of the parties that the process be conducted annually. As a minimum, however, such a process will be undertaken at least twice in the 5 year period of tenure.
The appraisal process is formative in nature and as such its main purpose is to provide supportive and developmental feed back to the individual. Self appraisal underpins this formative appraisal with validation by a person appointed by the school.

The following principles govern the formative appraisal process:

Based on the above principles, the process for the appraisal shall be as follows:

(E) Grievance Procedures

Where the validation Panel recommendation is not to appoint, then the applicant may appeal to an AST Review Panel.

The AST Review Panel shall consist of 4 members drawn from the pool identified in item (iii) of clause (A).

If the AST Review Panel endorses the original recommendation of the Validation Panel, no further administrative appeal is allowed.

If the AST Review Panel recommends appointment to an AST1, then this recommendation shall be substituted for the original recommendation to the Employing Authority.

Where an Employing Authority rejects a recommendation to appoint an AST1, the applicant must be advised in writing.

Any grievance arising from the rejection of a recommendation by the Employing Authority may be notified as a dispute in accordance with the Act.

(F) Re-Application

Upon the conclusion of the period of tenure, an AST1 may reapply for the current level, or may apply (if eligible and appropriate) for a higher level of Advanced Skills Teacher.

(G) Portability

There shall be portability of AST1 positions between Catholic Schools in Queensland.

(3) SCHOOL ASSOCIATED WITH THE ANGLICAN DIOCESE OF BRISBANE, FAIRHOLME COLLEGE AND SOMERSET COLLEGE

All members of the evaluation panel shall be provided with suitable training to ensure competency in performance of Duty and consistency in appraising applicants. The training syllabus shall be agreed between the Principal and members of the school's Working Party.

The composition of the evaluation panel may vary from application to application, however, all 3 members shall only be drawn from an appropriately trained pool of evaluators agreed to by the parties.

Each application must be assessed based on the criteria specified in this schedule and not against each other.

Criterion 1

Criterion 2

"Applying skills in effective classroom teaching practices and reporting and evaluating student progress.".

Criterion 3

"Positive relationships with students and effective communication with parents, Teachers and other community members.".

Criterion 4

"Develop ideas gained from their own teaching practice and apply knowledge gained from professional development activities to enhance student's learning.".

Criterion 5

"Knowledge of educational trends and current issues.".

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate an awareness and selectively apply knowledge of trends and current developments in education.

Criterion 6

"Contribution to the effective development, implementation and evaluation of programs within the school.".

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall demonstrate:

Criterion 7

"Participation in co-curricular Duty and pastoral care.".

To satisfy this criterion the applicant shall participate in co-curricular Duty and pastoral care, as detailed in the 'Hours of Duty' Agreement between the industrial organization and Schools respondent to this Schedule of the Award. To effectively satisfy this criteria, the applicant shall:

The portfolio would contain if necessary, written references and detailed evidence of the achievements and demonstrate specific skill criteria.

ADVANCED SKILLS TEACHER - LEVEL 1

In summary, an AST1 Teacher must be able to demonstrate the capacity to meet the following criteria:

(4) SCHOOLS MEMBERS OF THE PRESBYTERIAN AND METHODISTS SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION

In accordance with the provisions of clause 5.4 of the Award, the following shall apply to Teachers employed by The Presbyterian and Methodist Schools Association in regard to the appointment of Advanced Skills Teachers.

(A) Selection Criteria

An applicant for the position of AST1 will be assessed in relation to all the selection criteria listed in clauses 4(A)(i) to (viii) and will be required to satisfy to an acceptable standard 5 out of 7 of the criteria, with criterion (i) being mandatory.

(B) Selection Panel

Eligibility for appointment to an AST position would be determined by a Selection Panel consisting of:

The panel shall report recommendations to the Principal.

Where the assessment panel does not recommend the appointment of a Teacher as an AST1, then the Teacher may request details in writing of where they have failed to satisfy the criteria.

Where the Principal rejects the recommendation of the panel, the Principal shall indicate to the Teacher the reasons for such rejection and areas where improvement is required.

(C) Selection Criteria Guidelines

The Selection Panel shall use the following guidelines to assist in assessing whether a Teacher meets the AST selection criteria.

(D) Assessment

In lieu of clause 5.4.6 of the Award the following shall apply. An appointment as AST1, including initial tenured period, acknowledges an effective performance assessment process whether annual or by continuing review and not by exception.

(5) SCHOOLS MEMBERS OF THE QUEENSLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY LIMITED, INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION OF EMPLOYERS

Validation Panel:

The following Validation Panel will be set up at school level:

Membership:

Role:

The role is a validating one, i.e. the Panel evaluates the supporting evidence produced by the applicant and makes a recommendation to the employing Authority.

Suitable guidelines for both Panel members and applicants as well as in-service training will be provided as required.

Grievance Procedures:

(a) If the recommendation to the Employing Authority is not to appoint the Teacher as an AST1, then the Teacher is to be advised in writing of those criteria which the Teacher failed to satisfy. Any appeal shall be to an Appeals Panel comprising 3 members of the abovementioned pool approved by the Employing Authority and industrial organization. If this Appeals Panel confirms the original recommendation against appointment, no further administrative appeal is allowed.

(b) If the Employing Authority rejects a recommendation to appoint a Teacher as AST1, the Teacher must be advised that such is the case. Grievances arising out of a rejection by the Employing Authority may be notified as a dispute in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Performance Reviews:

The following Performance Reviews will take place within the time frame of the appointment:

Formative appraisal is the property of the holder of the AST1 classification and will not be used by the Employing Authority for re-application appraisal purposes.

Selection Criteria:

1.0 A Teacher applying for the AST1 classification will, to the panel's satisfaction, demonstrate advanced skills in all 5 general criteria listed in clauses 1.0(i) to (v), understood within a framework of the school's/system's values and ethos. This will be evidenced by meeting the performance indicators detailed in clause 2.0 through substantial and sustained performance.

1.1 At present the general selection criteria listed in clause 1.0(i) to (v) apply to the level of AST1. In relation to determination of AST 2 and 3 the same 5 general selection criteria will apply and further general selection criteria and/or specific performance indicators shall be negotiated by the parties and submitted to the Commission for inclusion in the Schedule.

2.0 Performance Indicators:

The applicant will be considered to have substantially satisfied these general criteria when the Teacher produces evidence relating to the following performance indicators. It is required that the applicant convince the Panel that his/her overall level of attainment in respect of each group of performance indicators taken together substantiate the standard and purpose of the criteria, consistent with the definition of AST as contained in clause 1.6.2 of the Award.

Failure to address all performance indicators need not necessarily disqualify a Teacher from validating the criteria and receiving a recommendation for the AST1 classification. Lack of opportunity to fulfil certain performance indicators or additional evidence of achievement outside the performance indicators but within the parameters of the general criteria or other relevant factors may be taken into account by panels assessing suitability for advancement to this classification.

The measurement of attainment for AST1, is "exemplary". By this it is intended that the Teacher's performance in respect to the criteria/indicators is such as to be a model for other Teachers, setting a high standard, placing the Teacher within the upper ranks of the profession.

Top Of PagePrevious PageNext Page