[2013] FWC 2070

Download Word Document

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s 160 - Application to vary a modern award to remove ambiguity or uncertainty or correct error

United Voice
(AM2013/1)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 9 APRIL 2013

Application to vary modern award to correct ambiguity or uncertainty - new liquor licensing in South Australia - consent of parties - determination made.

[1] On 28 March 2013, I made a determination in this matter effective from that date. These are my reasons for doing so.

[2] This decision concerns an application to vary a Modern Award; namely, the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009] (the ‘Award’) filed by United Voice (the ‘Union’) on 22 February, 2013. The application is made pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) which deal with the circumstances in which the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) may vary a Modern Award. For the purposes of this application, these provisions include, where it is necessary to achieve the Modern Award objectives (s 157) and where it is necessary to remove ambiguity or uncertainty (s 160).

[3] The application arises from a discrete set of new circumstances which pertain to recent legislative changes enacted by the South Australian Parliament to create a new category of liquor license in South Australia to be known as the ‘Small Venue Licence’. The particular legislation, the Liquor Licensing (Small Venue Licence) Amendment Act 2012 (SA) was passed by the Legislative Assembly on 19 February 2013 and received Royal Assent on 28 February 2013.

[4] The Union contends that the new category of liquor licence will create uncertainty and/or ambiguity in respect to the application of Schedule B of the Award, to venues which obtain a Small Venue Licence, particularly if the venue also holds other licences. This application would ensure that all venues in South Australia which have liquor licences will be covered by the Award, subject to the Schedule B transitional provisions, which transition employees from the Hotels, Club, Etc., Award [AN150066] to the Modern Award.

[5] The variation to the Award which is sought is as follows:

[6] The two legislative provisions, either of which, in my view, may apply to this application are as follows:

[7] The notification and processing of this application has been in accordance with the Commission’s Modern Award practices and principles. I am satisfied that all interested parties are aware of the application and the hearing date of 28 March 2013. I am further satisfied that the application is competently before the Commission.

[8] At the hearing, Ms L Harrison represented the Union, Mr H Wallgren appeared for Business SA and Mr T Evans appeared for the Australian Hotels Association (SA). I note that the employer parties do not oppose the application.

[9] Given the consent of the parties and the circumstances giving rise to the application (which were unknown at the time of the making of the Modern Award) and the desirability of removing any ambiguity or uncertainty about the Award’s application to an individual small venue license holder, I propose to made a determination to give effect to the variation of Schedule B of the Award in terms set out at para [5] of this decision.

[10] Even if I am wrong about the applicability of s 160 of the Act to this application, I also consider the variation would achieve the Modern Award objectives, pursuant to s 152 of the Act. A determination to the above effect will be published contemporaneously with this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

Ms L Harrison, United Voice

Mr H Wallgren, Business SA

Mr T Evans, Australian Hotels Association

Hearing details:

2013

Sydney:

28 March

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, PR535418>