[2013] FWC 4509

Download Word Document

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 5, Item 6 - Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years

Sarin Marine Farming Pty Ltd on behalf of the National Aquacultural Council Modern Award Reference Group
(AM2012/15)

Tassal Operations Pty Ltd on behalf of the National Aquacultural Council Modern Award Reference Group
(AM2012/16)

AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY AWARD 2010

(ODN AM2008/65)

[MA000114  PR991081]

Aquaculture

COMMISSIONER ROBERTS

SYDNEY, 12 JULY 2013

Review of the Aquaculture Industry Award 2010.

[1] This decision concerns separate applications by Sarin Marine Farming Pty Ltd (Sarin) and Tassal Operations Pty Ltd (Tassal). Both applications were made on behalf of the National Aquacultural Council Modern Award Reference Group: Tassal Operations Pty Ltd; Pacific Reef Pty Ltd; Huon Aquaculture Company Pty Ltd; Australian Prawn Farmers Association; Salmon Growers Association (Tas) and Austuna (Tuna Farming), to vary the Aquaculture Industry Award 2010 (the Award). The applications are made under Schedule 5, Item 6 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the Transitional Act) as part of the review of all modern awards which Fair Work Australia (now the Fair Work Commission) is required to conduct after the first two years of those modern awards coming into effect (the 2012 Review).

[2] Both applications were listed for mention and programming on 14 August 2012 and this was followed by numerous conferences between the Commission and the parties and between the parties themselves which lasted until on or about 1 July 2013. As a result of those conferences, the parties have been able to reach a consent position.

[3] Sarin and Tassal were represented by Mr F McMahon. Ms Z Angus appeared for the Australian Workers’ Union (the AWU). In addition, appearances were entered by Mr B Jeffriess of Sarin, Ms K Little of Tassal Group Limited, Ms V Hinton of Business SA and Ms G Kusuma of NSW Farmers (Industrial) Association.

The legislation

[4] Schedule 5, Item 6 of the Transitional Act provides:

[5] Provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) are also applicable and relevant to the 2012 Review. Sections 134 and 138 of the Act provide as follows:

[6] On 29 June 2012, the 2012 Review Full Bench published a decision in relation to the 2012 Review 1. The Full Bench said:

[7] The Full Bench went on to say:

[8] The Full Bench said in relation to the application of section 138 of the Act to the 2012 Review:

[9] I now turn to consideration of each of the two applications.

Application by Sarin

[10] Sarin’s application was made on behalf of the National Aquacultural Council Modern Award Reference Group and sought to insert a new subclause in the Award in the following terms:

Application by Tassal

[11] Tassal’s application sought to delete the existing clause 19 of the Award and replace it with the following:

[12] Tassal also sought to insert a new clause 20 into the Award in the following terms:

20.1 · For the purposes of this award:

20.3 Afternoon and night shift allowances

Conclusion

[13] Having examined the consent variations submitted by the parties, and having had the benefit of being apprised of the various stages in the negotiations between the parties, I am satisfied that the consent variations sought by the parties to vary the Award are consistent with the Modern Award objective and I will issue a determination in the terms sought.

[14] That Determination is contained in PR538859.

COMMISSIONER

 1   [2012] FWAFB 5600.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, MA000114  PR538705>