[2014] FWC 4227
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Concept Engineering (Aust) Pty Ltd
(AG2014/1337)

COMMISSIONER RYAN

MELBOURNE, 27 JUNE 2014

Application for approval of the Concept Engineering (Aust) Pty Ltd Metals Labour Hire Agreement 2013-2016.

[1] Application was made on 6 June 2014 by Concept Engineering (Aust) Pty Ltd for approval of the Concept Engineering (Aust) Pty Ltd Metals Labour Hire Agreement 2013-2016 (the agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the FW Act).

[2] The employer’s declaration in support of approval (Form F17) identified that employees were advised by mail on 1 May 2014 that the voting method would be by postal vote and that the correspondence attached the voting slip and return envelope.

[3] The correspondence to employees referred to in the F17 included the following terms:

[4] I have considered the procedure implemented by the employer in light of the requirements of the FW Act.

[5] Sections 180, 181 and 182 of the FW Act deal with the making of enterprise agreements. These sections provide as follows:

[6] The language of these three sections of the FW Act leads me to conclude that Concept Engineering (Aust.) Pty Ltd has not complied with the requirements of the FW Act and that the enterprise agreement has not been made in accordance with the provisions of the FW Act.

[7] Section180(1) provides that an employer cannot request employees to vote on an enterprise agreement until the employer has undertaken three actions, namely:

[8] Each of these three actions has to occur within a set time. The requirement specified in s.180(2)(a) must occur sometime during the “access period”. The requirement specified in s.180(2)(b) must occur throughout the “access period”. The requirement specified in s.180(3) must occur before the start of the “access period”.

[9] The “access period” is defined in s.180(4) as being “the 7 day period ending immediately before the start of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).”

[10] The emphasis in the definition of “access period” is not on the actual commencement of the vote, nor on the conclusion of the actual vote but is expressed more generally to include the “voting process referred to in subsection 181(1).”

[11] It appears from the structure of Division 4 of Part 2-4 of the FW Act that there is a difference in meaning between the term “voting process” and the actual commencement or conclusion of the vote of employees. This is readily seen by comparing the language of subsections 182(1) and (2).

[12] In s.182(1) an agreement is made when a majority of employees approve the agreement. The making of the agreement occurs in a technical sense at the conclusion of the vote even if the voting process has not been completed. Thus if the voting process contains a detailed procedure for the counting of votes and the formal declaration of the results of the vote the enterprise agreement is not made at the conclusion of the declaration of the vote, which may be sometime after the close of the vote but rather is made as at the date of the close of the ballot. This is so because whilst it may take some time to count and declare the vote, the enterprise agreement is made “when a majority of those employees who cast a valid vote approve the agreement”, and, all that the count and declaration have done is to confirm that as at the close of the ballot a majority of those employees who cast a valid vote approved the agreement.

[13] In the case of a multi-enterprise agreement s.182(2) provides for a different time at which the multi-enterprise agreement is made. A multi-enterprise agreement is made “immediately after the end of the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1)”. The emphasis on the end of the voting process reflects the fact that in a multi-enterprise agreement there may be some enterprises where the vote went against approval of the agreement and some where the vote was to approve the agreement. In such a case the multi-enterprise agreement is only made in relation to those employers whose employees approved the multi-enterprise agreement. The voting process itself may include different start and finish times for the votes of employees at different enterprises. Thus the emphasis is placed upon the end of the voting process as the appropriate time to determine if the multi-enterprise agreement is made.

[14] As both sections 180(4) and 182(2) refer to “the voting process referred to in subsection 181(1)” that term must have the same meaning in both sections. Section 180(4) refers to the start of the voting process and s.182(2) refers to the end of the voting process. However the language of s.181 does not refer to a voting process but only to a request by the employer.

[15] The term “voting process” as used in s.180(4) and s.182(2) is reference to the employer requesting the employees employed at the time who will be covered by the agreement to approve the agreement by voting for it.

[16] Whilst the term “voting process” is not defined the term should be given its ordinary meaning.

[17] ‘Process’ is defined in the Macquarie Concise Dictionary to mean:

[18] The term “voting process” as used in s.180(4) and s.182(2) must include the systematic series of actions by which an employer initiates the request for employees to approve the agreement by voting on it, carries out the request for employees to approve the agreement by voting on it and determines the outcome of the request for employees to approve the agreement by voting on it. This must be so as the end of the process is to determine whether or not the employees approve the agreement.

[19] I note that s.180(3) requires the employer to take all reasonable steps by the start of the access period to notify relevant employees of both the time and place at which the vote will occur and the voting method that will be used. This requirement to give early notice to employees of what will occur does not detract from what constitutes the “voting process referred to in subsection 181(1)”.

[20] Whilst it is not necessary to detail every likely action that would comprise the systematic series of actions directed to having employees vote to approve an enterprise agreement, it would appear obvious that at least two of the actions would include the distribution of voting material to the employees and, where the vote is by postal ballot, the distribution to employees of the means to return their votes.

[21] As identified in paragraph 2 above the employer had at the very least commenced the “voting process’ on 1 May 2014 by sending to employees the covering letter for the vote, the ballot paper and the return envelope for the ballot paper.

[22] The access period as defined by s.180(4) was therefore the 7 day period ending immediately before the 1 May 2014.

[23] The employer has not complied with the requirements of s.180(3) of the FW Act. Non compliance with any one of ss.180(2)(a), 180(2)(b) or 180(3) means that the employer could not, because of s.180(1), make a request under s.181(1) to employees to approve the agreement and thus the employees could not make the agreement by voting for it under s.182.

[24] As such there is no valid application before the Commission and I therefore dismiss the application.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR552425>