Skip to main content

Ribbon

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Glossary
  • News & media
Fair Work Commission logo

Fair Work Commission

Australia's national workplace relations tribunal
Search is closed
Menu is closed

Search

Main menu

  • Awards & agreements
    • Minimum wages & conditions
    • Awards
    • Agreements
    • Legislation & regulations for awards & agreements
  • Cases, decisions & orders
    • Major cases
    • Summaries of significant decisions
    • Decisions by keywords
    • FWC Bulletin
    • Archived decisions & orders
    • Transcripts
    • Court reviews
    • Historical cases
  • Registered organisations
    • Fact sheets, templates & webinars
    • Find registered organisations
    • Find State-recognised associations
    • Registration
    • Running a registered organisation
    • Entry permits
    • Industrial action
    • Gazette notices
    • Lodgment
  • Resources
    • Online lodgment
    • Forms
    • Where to get legal help
    • Research
    • Workplace Relations Education Series
    • Benchbooks
    • Fact sheets, guides & videos
    • Practice notes
    • Resources in other languages
    • Case studies
    • Quarterly practitioner updates
    • Related sites
  • Termination of employment
    • Unfair dismissal
    • General protections dismissal
    • Unlawful termination
    • How the Commission works
  • Disputes at work
    • Fairness in the workplace
    • Resolving issues at the Commission
    • Cooperative Workplaces program
    • JobKeeper disputes
    • General protections (unlawful actions)
    • Anti-bullying
    • Industrial action
    • Awards & enterprise agreements disputes
    • Disputes about entry
    • How the Commission works
  • Home
  • Enterprise agreements benchbook
  • Commission approval process
Back to top

Enterprise agreements benchbook

An overview of legal procedure & case law

Undertakings

Print this page

 

Table of contents

On this page

  • Overview
  • Process
  • Case example
  • Financial detriment
  • Case example
  • Substantial change
  • Case examples
  • References

 

Overview

See Fair Work Act 2009 ss.190–191

Where the Fair Work Commission has a concern that an enterprise agreement does not meet the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Fair Work Act (which include the better off overall test), the Commission may accept a written undertaking that meets this concern and approve the agreement.

Before accepting an undertaking, the Commission must:

  • seek the views of each known bargaining representative for the agreement
  • be satisfied the effect of accepting the undertaking is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the agreement, or result in substantial changes to the agreement.

An undertaking relating to an enterprise agreement must be signed by each employer who gives the undertaking.[1]

A residual discretion remains to be exercised even if the undertaking that has been accepted meets the identified concern.[2]

If an undertaking is accepted, the terms of the undertaking are taken to be a term of the agreement.[3]

An undertaking that is expressed as varying a particular provision in an enterprise agreement should be taken to be a promise by the employer that the provision will not be applied and the term as set out in the undertaking will be.[4]

An undertaking can only be accepted where there is a concern under ss.186 and 187; not to address other deficiencies.[5]

'Section 190(3) does not permit undertakings that result in the wholesale reshaping of the agreement, such that it bears no resemblance to the pre-undertaking agreement that was approved by employees.'[6]

Important

The Commission cannot accept an undertaking to correct deficiencies of a flexibility term or a consultation term because they are not concerns about matters in s.186 and s.187 of the Fair Work Act.[7]

If the Commission has any concerns with these then the model clauses will be inserted.

Related information

  • Model flexibility term – Schedule 2.2
  • Model consultation term – Schedule 2.3

Process

The process for offering and accepting undertakings, assessing whether an accepted undertaking meets the requisite concern, and considering whether to approve an enterprise agreement may be summarised as follows:

  1. There must be made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement.
  2. The Commission must have a concern that the agreement does not meet one or more of the requirements set out in ss.186 and 187 of the Fair Work Act. It should go without saying that the relevant concern needs to be identified by the Commission and communicated to the applicant for the approval of the agreement, and where the applicant is a bargaining representative for the agreement which is not the employer, also communicated to the employer or employers covered by the agreement. Only an employer or employers covered by an agreement can give an undertaking.
  3. There must be a written undertaking from one or more of the employers covered by the agreement and that undertaking must meet the signing requirements.
  4. The Commission must assess and be satisfied that the effect of accepting the undertaking is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the agreement or result in substantial changes to the agreement.
  5. Before accepting an undertaking the Commission must seek the views of known bargaining representatives for the agreement.
  6. If the undertaking is accepted the Commission must be satisfied that the accepted undertaking meets its concern before it may approve the agreement.
  7. There is a residual discretion to be exercised whether to approve the agreement with the undertaking that has been accepted and that meets the identified concern.[8]

Case example

Views of bargaining representatives NOT sought

Australian Workers' Union v Roadworx Surfacing Pty Ltd

Australian Workers' Union v Roadworx Surfacing Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 1759 (Harrison SDP, Richards SDP, Williams C, 10 May 2011), [(2011) 207 IR 362].

All employees covered by an agreement had appointed themselves bargaining representatives. Prior to the vote for the agreement, a number of the employees revoked their own appointments, resulting in the AWU becoming a default bargaining representative. The enterprise agreement was ultimately made and an application for its approval was made to the Commission. There were concerns as to whether the agreement could be approved, but ultimately it was approved with undertakings.

The AWU appealed the decision to approve the agreement, arguing that, among other issues, bargaining representatives were not shown a copy of the undertakings or asked for their views. The Full Bench found that the legislation required that all bargaining representatives, including the AWU and the employees who had appointed themselves, should have been provided with a copy of the undertakings and their views should have been sought.

Accordingly, the decision to approve the agreement was quashed.

Financial detriment

An undertaking that reduces or removes an employee entitlement in an agreement and consequently be likely to cause financial detriment cannot be accepted by the Commission. This would change the nature of the agreement and may have affected the way the employees chose to vote on it.

An illustrative example is provided in the Explanatory Memorandum:[9]

The EN & EM Surveillance Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 covers 800 employees working in a local security business. The Commission has a concern that the agreement may not pass the better off overall test for a group of 80 employees employed under the classification of Static Guard. The agreement would pass the better off overall test if the base rate of pay under the agreement was increased by 23 cents per hour. The Commission may accept an undertaking from the employer to pay the additional 23 cents an hour, without putting the agreement out for a further approval process, because it is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the agreement, and would not result in substantial changes to the agreement.

The Commission also has a concern that the EN & EM Surveillance Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011 would not pass the better off overall test for employees employed under the classification of Security Patrol Officers if those employees were rostered to work on Sundays. In this situation, the Commission could not accept an undertaking from the employer that those employees would no longer be required to work on Sundays because such an undertaking is likely to cause financial detriment to those employees as they would lose the opportunity to work on Sundays for penalty rates. This would change the nature of the agreement and may have affected the way the employees chose to vote on it.

Case example

Undertakings – NO financial detriment

Re Bupa Care Services Pty Ltd

Re Bupa Care Services Pty Ltd [2010] FWAFB 2762 (Acton SDP, Sams DP, Williams C, 15 April 2010), [(2010) 196 IR 1].

An appeal was made against decisions of the Commission to refuse the approval of ten agreements which contained preferred hours clauses. The clauses provided that where an employee requested to work additional hours, those additional hours would be paid at their ordinary hourly rate and would not attract overtime payments.

The appeals were dealt with concurrently due to the similarity in the clauses in the agreements that lead the Commission to refuse approval.

The Full Bench found that the Commission erred in not providing the employers with an opportunity to provide a written undertaking to meet the concerns about the preferred hours clauses.

The Full Bench was satisfied that, in relation to each of the ten agreements, the relevant detriment to employees as a result of the clause was financial and that the detriment could be removed by an undertaking.

The decisions not to approve the agreements were quashed, and each application referred back to the Commission for consideration.

Substantial change

The Commission cannot accept an undertaking unless the effect of accepting it is not likely to result in substantial changes to the agreement. This suggests that minor changes to an agreement resulting from an undertaking are permissible.[10]

To view proposed undertakings as a variation to an agreement rather than an undertaking merely because of the expression used in the undertakings is 'to adopt an unnecessarily technical approach to the giving undertakings and is not one that is warranted'.[11]

In the decision Re Hyatt Ground Engineering Pty Ltd [12] the Commission said:

"[30] The sense in which the word 'substantial' appears in s.190(3)(b) is in my view to describe changes to the agreement as result of undertakings offered where the changes are not 'trivial or minimal' or 'phemeral or nominal'.

[31] In this sense 'substantial' is not a quantitative term but a qualitative term. A number of trivial or minimal changes to the agreement may not constitute a substantial change to the agreement. However even a single change to a provision of the agreement where the change was not trivial or minimal would constitute a substantial change to the agreement."

Case examples

Undertakings – NO substantial change

Re Australian Industry Group

Re Australian Industry Group [2010] FWAFB 4337 (Giudice J, Watson SDP, Blair C, 11 June 2010).

An application was made for approval of the Newlands Coal Dunlop Foams (NSW) Collective Agreement 2009. At first instance, the Commission approved the agreement.

The Australian Industry Group appealed the decision on the basis that the agreement contained an unlawful term, dealing with right of entry.

The Full Bench concluded that the term was an unlawful term, and that the agreement should not have been approved in that form. However, the Commission would accept an undertaking from the employer that the any exercise of a power under the unlawful term would be in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, subject to agreement to the undertaking by the bargaining representatives.

Undertakings – substantial change

Australian institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Inco Ships Pty Ltd

Australian institute of Marine and Power Engineers v Inco Ships Pty Ltd [2011] FWAFB 1537 (Watson SDP, McCarthy DP, Deegan C, 10 March 2011), [(2011) 204 IR 66].

The AIMPE sought permission to appeal a decision at first instance approving the Inco Ships Pty Ltd Officer Collective Agreement 2010 MV CSL Melbourne. Under the terms of the agreement, employees were provided with increased salary in lieu of entitlements to long service leave and redundancy pay. In this case, the relevant long service leave entitlements were sourced in an award which allowed entitlements to be cashed out in advance.

The agreement provided for the incorporation into salary of an amount in respect of long service leave and extinguished any entitlement to long service leave and payment for long service leave upon termination. The agreement did not include terms that had the same (or substantially the same) effect as provisions of the NES in respect of long service leave.

The Full Bench concluded that the contraventions of the NES within the agreement could not be remedied by an undertaking because such an undertaking would result in substantial changes to the agreement. In addition, any undertaking would cause financial detriment to an employee covered by the agreement.

The Full Bench granted permission to appeal and upheld the appeal. The decision of the Commission approving the agreement was quashed.

Re Kore Construction Pty Ltd

Re Kore Construction Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 1955 (Gostencnik DP, 24 March 2014).

Kore Construction lodged an application for the approval of the Kore Construction Enterprise Agreement 2013. The Commission found that the agreement as lodged for approval did not pass the BOOT.

Kore Construction proposed a series of undertakings to address the concerns of the Commission. The CFMEU submitted that the proposed undertakings would result in a substantial change to the agreement and should not be accepted.

The Commission found that it was clear from the nature of the proposed undertakings that each sought to address any financial disadvantage under the agreement when compared to the modern award. However, when the undertakings were examined in their entirety, it was clear that they resulted in substantial changes to the agreement. The undertakings involved changes to the wage rates attached to classifications in the agreement, the inclusion of substantive new provisions into the agreement, and the inclusion of substantive allowances not previously provided for in the agreement.

The proposed undertakings were not accepted and the Commission declined to approve the agreement.

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Lightning Brick Pavers t/a Lightning Brick Pavers

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Lightning Brick Pavers t/a Lightning Brick Pavers [2018] FWCFB 3825 (Hatcher VP, Catanzariti VP, Gostencnik DP, Lee C, Harper-Greenwell C, 28 June 2018).

At first instance the Commission approved the Lightning Brick Pavers Enterprise Agreement 2017-2021 with undertakings. The CFMMEU contended that the Commission erred in approving the Agreement because the approval was based on the acceptance of undertakings which resulted in substantial changes to the Agreement contrary to s.190(3) of the Fair Work Act.

The Full Bench found that the undertakings, which ran to almost 5 pages of text, were extensive in scope and altered a range of conditions in the Agreement in an extensive way. Whilst some of the undertakings were relatively minor and were entirely beneficial to employees, others were much more significant.

First, the remuneration structure was reshaped entirely. The Agreement contains a loaded rate structure, that was changed to a different structure which involved significantly lower ordinary rates of remuneration, a restoration of some of the Award allowances and a higher rate of overtime. Second, the scale of redundancy payments was changed in a way which reduced them for employees with from one to about 2½ years' service. This constituted a straight out reduction in the redundancy entitlement.

The Full Bench held that the acceptance of the undertakings was critical to the Commission's determination to approve the Agreement. The Full Bench found that in the circumstances the Commission erred in approving the Agreement, as the undertakings could not have been accepted because they were incapable of satisfying the condition in s.190(3)(b). Permission to appeal was granted and, because of the extent to which the undertakings altered the terms of the Agreement, the appeal was upheld and the decision quashed.

References

[1] Fair Work Regulations reg 2.07.

[2] Application by Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board [2019] FWC 106 (Gostencnik DP, 15 January 2019) at para. 26.

[3] Fair Work Act s.191(2).

[4] Re Kore Construction Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 1955 (Gostencnik DP, 24 March 2014) at para. 30.

[5] See for example Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FWC 2140 (Hatcher VP, 13 April 2018). Note: this issue is currently the subject of legal proceedings before the Federal Court (Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v AMWU & others (VID 731/2018)).

[6] Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v KAEFER Integrated Services Pty Ltd [2017] FWCFB 5630 (Hatcher VP, Colman DP, Harper-Greenwell C, 20 November 2017) at para. 41.

[7] See for example Re PPG Industries Australia Pty Limited [2015] FWCA 5591 (Lee C, 3 September 2015) at para. 13.

[8] BGC Contracting Pty Ltd T/A BGC [2018] FWC 6936 (Gostencnik DP, 16 November 2018) at paras 15–22.

[9] Explanatory Memorandum to Fair Work Bill 2008 at para. 807.

[10] Fair Work Act s.190(3)(b).

[11] Re Kore Construction Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 1955 (Gostencnik DP, 24 March 2014) at para. 30.

[12] Hyatt Ground Engineering Pty Ltd [2011] FWA 3527 (Ryan C, 3 June 2011).

Updated time

Last updated

24 May 2019

 

 

Bookmark/Search this post

Facebook logo Google+ logo Twitter logo

 

Page feedback

Did you find what you were looking for?

Please note: If you would like a response to your question, please contact us or lodge a complaint. This feedback is only about content on this page and will be used to improve website usability. The comments are not monitored for personal information or workplace complaints. 

Mini sites

  • Annual Report 2013–14
    • Reader's guide
    • 1. Overview
      • President's introduction
      • General Manager's overview
      • Performance summary
      • Major achievements 2013–14
    • 2. About the Commission
      • Who we are and what we do
      • Our structure
      • Outcome and program structure
      • Our clients and stakeholders
        • In focus—Small Business Outreach
      • Our future direction
        • In focus–New website
        • In focus–Virtual tour
        • In focus–Mock hearings
      • Our history
    • 3. Performance reporting
      • Overview
      • Legislative amendments
      • Workload
      • Timeliness benchmarks
      • Resolving disputes
      • Determining unfair dismissal applications
      • Setting the minimum wage
        • In focus–Pay Equity Unit
      • Orders relating to industrial action
        • Case study–Emergency Services Telecommunications Authority
        • Case study–Sydney Water
      • Processes relating to modern awards
        • In focus–4 yearly review of awards
      • Approving agreements
        • Case study–Catholic Education Victoria
        • Case study–Orora Fibre Packaging
      • Regulating registered organisations
      • Determining anti-bullying applications
        • In focus–Setting up the anti-bullying jurisdiction
        • Case study–Anti-bullying
      • Key performance indicators
    • 4. Management and accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Planning and development
      • Ethical standards
      • Accountability
      • Our workforce
      • Employee pay and entitlements
      • Service Charter, complaints and Code of Conduct
      • Financial management
    • 5. Appendices
      • A | Member activities
      • B | List of Members
      • C | Panel assignments
      • D | Methodology for Chart 2–Matters dealt with by the Commission and its predecessors 1998–99 to 2013–14
      • E | Promoting fairness and improving access
      • F | Efficiency and innovation
      • G | Increasing accountability
      • H | Productivity and engaging with industry
      • I | Documents relating to the work of the Commission
      • J | Fair Work Commission addresses
      • K | Lodgment and case load statistics
      • L | Methodology for Chart 6–Number of Commission sittings, various
      • M | Subscription services
      • N | Information on specific statutory requirements
      • O | Fraud Control Certificate
      • P | Fair Work Commission Service Charter
      • Q | Financial statements
        • Independent Audit Report
        • Statement by the General Manager and Chief Financial Officer
        • Statement of Comprehensive Income
        • Statement of Financial Position
        • Statement of Changes in Equity
        • Cash Flow Statement
        • Schedule of Commitments
        • Schedule of Administered Items
        • Notes to the financial statements
          • Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
          • Note 2: Events after the Reporting Period
          • Note 3: Expenses
          • Note 4: Income
          • Note 5: Fair Value Measurements
          • Note 6: Financial Assets
          • Note 7: Non-financial Assets
          • Note 8: Payables
          • Note 9: Provisions
          • Note 10: Cash Flow Reconciliation
          • Note 11: Contingent Liabilities and Assets
          • Note 12: Senior Executive Remuneration
          • Note 13: Remuneration of Auditors
          • Note 14: Financial Instruments
          • Note 15: Financial Assets Reconciliation
          • Note 16: Administered Income
          • Note 17: Administered Payables
          • Note 18: Administered Cash Flow Reconciliation
          • Note 19: Administered Contingent Liabilities and Assets
          • Note 20: Appropriations
          • Note 21: Compliance with Statutory Conditions for Payments from the Consolidated Revenue Fund
          • Note 22: Compensation and Debt Relief
          • Note 23: Reporting of Outcomes
          • Note 24: Net Cash Appropriation Arrangements
      • R | Agency resource statement
      • S | Expenses and resources for outcome
      • T | Glossary
      • U | Acronyms and abbreviations
      • V | List of requirements
    • Letter of transmittal
    • Inquiries and copyright
    • Videos
    • Downloads
  • Annual Report 2014–15
    • Introduction
    • Preliminary information
      • Contents
      • Letter of transmittal
      • Readers guide
    • Part 1 Overview
      • President's introduction
      • General Manager's overview
      • Performance summary
      • Major achievements
    • Part 2 About the Commission
      • Outcome and programme structure
      • Who we are and what we do
      • Our structure
      • Our history
      • Our clients and stakeholders
      • Our future direction
      • Future directions - Continuing the change program
    • Part 3 Performance reporting
      • Overview
      • Legislative amendments
      • Workload
      • Timeliness benchmarks
      • Resolving disputes
      • Unlawful termination disputes
      • Determining unfair dismissal applications
      • Setting the minimum wage
      • Orders relating to industrial action
      • Processes relating to modern awards
      • Enterprise agreements
      • Determining anti-bullying applications
      • Regulating registered organisations
      • Key performance indicators
    • Part 4 Management and accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Planning and development
      • Workplace health and safety
      • Business continuity
      • Ethical standards
      • Fair Work Commission values
      • Freedom of information
      • Accountability
      • The Commission's workforce
      • Employee pay and entitlements
      • Service Charter, complaints and code of conduct
      • Financial management
      • Agency resource statement
      • Expenses and resources for outcome
    • Acronyms and abbreviations
    • Part 5 Appendices
      • Appendix A
      • Appendix B
      • Appendix C
      • Appendix D
      • Appendix E
      • Appendix F
      • Appendix G
      • Appendix H
      • Appendix I
      • Appendix J
      • Appendix K
      • Appendix L
      • Appendix M
      • Appendix N
      • Glossary
  • Annual Report 2015–16
    • Preliminary information
      • Letter of transmittal
      • Readers' guide
    • Part 1: Overview
      • President's report
      • General Manager's report
    • Part 2: About the Commission
    • Part 3: Performance
      • Performance summary
      • Annual performance statements 2015–16
      • Operational performance
        • Applications lodged
        • Hearings & conferences
        • Information & assistance
        • Major application types
          • Unfair dismissals
          • General protections & unlawful termination disputes
          • Anti-bullying
          • Enterprise agreements
          • Resolving disputes
          • Industrial action
        • New Approaches
        • Setting the minimum wage
        • Modern awards
        • Regulating registered organisations
        • Appeals
      • Significant decisions
      • Case studies
        • Case study: Enterprise agreements pilot
        • Case study: Patrick & the MUA
        • Case study: Encouraging regulatory compliance
    • Part 4: Management & accountability
      • Corporate governance
      • Financial management
      • Other mandatory information
    • Appendices
      • Appendix A: List of Members
      • Appendix B: Panel assignments
      • Appendix C: Member activities
      • Appendix D: Lodgment & case load statistics
      • Appendix E: Registered organisations data
      • Appendix F: Performance reporting for the RSRT
      • Appendix G: Financial statements
      • Appendix H: Subscription services
      • Appendix I: Service charter
      • Appendix J: List of requirements
      • Appendix K: Expense & resources outcome, agency resource statement & financial performance analysis
    • Glossary
    • Acronyms & abbreviations
    • Contact us
  • Annual Wage Review 2013–14
  • Anti-bullying benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
    • What is workplace bullying?
    • Who is covered by workplace bullying laws?
      • Definition of ‘worker’
      • Definition of ‘constitutionally-covered business’
        • What is a person conducting a business or undertaking?
        • What is a Territory or a Commonwealth place?
        • What is a constitutional corporation?
        • What is the Commonwealth?
    • When is a worker bullied at work?
      • What does ‘at work’ mean?
      • Risk of continued bullying
      • Reasonable management action
    • Making an application
    • Responding to an application
    • If the worker has been dismissed
    • Commission processes
      • Procedural issues
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
    • Evidence
    • Outcomes
      • Dismissing an application
      • Contravening an order of the Commission
    • Associated applications
      • Costs
      • Appeals
      • Role of the Court
  • Corporate Plan 2018–19
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Culture
    • 5. Capability
    • 6. Performance
  • Corporate Plan 2019–20
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Our focus
    • 5. Culture
    • 6. Capability
    • 7. Performance
  • Corporate Plan 2020-21
    • 1. Message from the General Manager
    • 2. Purpose
    • 3. Operating environment
    • 4. Key activities
    • 5. Capability
    • 6. Risk
    • 7. Performance
  • Enterprise agreements benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
    • What is an enterprise agreement?
      • Single-enterprise agreement
      • Multi-enterprise agreement
      • Differences between single and multi-enterprise agreements
      • Greenfields agreement
    • Content of an enterprise agreement
      • Permitted matters
      • Coverage
      • Scope – who will be covered?
      • Terms & conditions of employment
      • Base rate of pay
      • Nominal expiry date
      • Mandatory terms
      • Flexibility term
      • Consultation term
      • Dispute settlement term
      • Optional terms
      • Terms that cannot be included
        • Terms that exclude the NES
        • Unlawful terms
        • Designated outworker terms
    • Agreement making process
      • Representation
      • Employee right to be represented
      • Bargaining representatives
    • Bargaining
      • Good faith bargaining
      • How long does bargaining take?
    • Voting
      • Voting process
      • Who can vote?
      • Timeframe for vote
      • Voting methods
      • When is an agreement made?
      • If parties cannot agree
    • Making an application
      • Common defects & issues
        • National Employment Standards
        • Better off overall test
        • Mandatory terms
        • Other terms
        • Pre-approval requirements
        • Forms & lodgment
      • Who must apply
      • Timeframe to apply
      • Material to accompany application
      • Signing an agreement
      • Employer must notify employees
    • Commission approval process
      • Genuine agreement
        • Minor procedural or technical errors
      • Where a scope order is in operation
      • Particular kinds of employees
      • Better off overall test (BOOT)
        • When an agreement passes
        • Classes of employees
        • Which award applies
        • Advice about coverage
        • Loaded rates of pay
      • Public interest test
      • Undertakings
      • Powers of the Commission
    • Associated applications
      • Majority support determinations
      • Authorisations to commence bargaining
        • Single interest employer authorisations
        • Ministerial declaration
        • Low-paid authorisations
      • Scope orders
      • Bargaining orders
      • Serious breach declarations
      • Disputes
      • Workplace determinations
        • Low-paid
        • Industrial action related
        • Bargaining related
      • Role of the Court
      • Appeals
      • Varying enterprise agreements
        • Varying by agreement
        • Ambiguity or uncertainty
        • Discrimination
      • Terminating enterprise agreements
        • Terminating by agreement
        • After its nominal expiry date
      • Terminating individual agreements
  • General Manager reporting requirements
  • General protections benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Overview of benchbook
      • When is a person covered by the general protections?
    • What are the general protections?
    • How do the general protections work?
      • Rebuttable presumption as to reason or intent
    • Coverage for general protections
      • What is a constitutionally-covered entity?
      • What is a Territory or a Commonwealth place?
      • What is a trade and commerce employer?
      • What is a Territory employer?
      • What is a national system employer?
    • What if I am not covered?
    • What is adverse action?
      • What is dismissal?
      • Injuring employee in their employment
      • Altering the position of the employee
      • Discriminating
      • Threatened action and organisation of action
      • Exclusions
    • Workplace rights protections
      • Meaning of workplace right
      • Coercion
      • Undue influence or pressure
      • Misrepresentations
      • Requiring the use of COVIDSafe
    • Industrial activities protections
      • What are industrial activities?
      • Coercion
      • Misrepresentations
      • Inducements – membership action
    • Other protections
      • Discrimination
        • Race
        • Colour
        • Gender identity & sexual orientation
        • Age
        • Physical or mental disability
        • Marital status
        • Family or carer’s responsibilities
        • Pregnancy
        • Religion
        • Political opinion
        • National extraction
        • Social origin
      • Exceptions
      • Temporary absence – illness or injury
      • Bargaining services fees
      • Coverage by particular instruments
      • Coercion – allocation of duties to particular person
    • Sham arrangements
      • Misrepresenting employment
      • Dismissing to engage as independent contractor
      • Misrepresentation to engage as independent contractor
    • Making an application
      • Dismissal applications
        • Timeframe for lodgment
        • Extension of time for lodging an application
      • Non-dismissal applications
      • Other types of applications
        • Multiple actions relating to dismissal
        • Unfair dismissal
        • Unlawful termination
        • Court application
        • Discrimination
    • Power to dismiss applications
    • Evidence
    • Commission process
      • Conferences & hearings
      • Dealing with different types of general protections disputes
      • Rescheduling or adjourning matters
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
      • Bias
    • Outcomes
    • Costs
      • When are costs ordered by the Commission?
      • Costs against representatives
    • Appeals
    • Role of the Court
      • Enforcement of Commission orders
      • Types of order made by the Court
  • Industrial action benchbook
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • What is industrial action?
      • Unprotected industrial action
        • Orders to stop or prevent unprotected industrial action
      • Protected industrial action
        • Immunity
        • Common requirements
        • Employee claim action
        • Employer response action
        • Employee response action
        • Pattern bargaining
    • Taking protected industrial action
      • Protected action ballots
        • Who may apply?
        • Making an application
        • Commission process
        • Varying a protected action ballot order
        • Revoking a protected action ballot order
      • Voting
        • Ballot agents
        • Who may vote – roll of voters
        • Ballot papers
        • Voting procedure
        • Scrutiny of the ballot
        • Results of the ballot
        • When is industrial action authorised?
      • Notice requirements
      • Commencing protected industrial action
    • Payments relating to industrial action
      • Partial work bans
      • Unprotected industrial action – payments
      • Standing down employees
    • Suspension or termination of protected industrial action
      • Powers of the Commission
        • When the Commission may suspend or terminate
        • When the Commission must suspend or terminate
          • Threats to persons or the economy
          • Suspending industrial action
        • Requirements relating to a period of suspension
      • Powers of the Minister
    • Enforcement
    • Appeals
  • JobKeeper benchbook
    • Glossary
    • Introduction
      • Provisions of the Fair Work Act
    • JobKeeper enabling directions – general
      • Service & entitlement accrual
      • When a JobKeeper enabling direction will have no effect
      • Stand downs that are not jobkeeper enabling stand downs
      • Employee requests
    • Jobkeeper enabling stand down directions – entitled employers
      • Directions about duties & location of work
    • Jobkeeper enabling directions – legacy employers
      • Jobkeeper enabling stand down directions – legacy employers
      • Directions about duties & location of work – legacy employers
      • Termination of a jobkeeper enabling direction – legacy employers
    • Agreements about days or times of work
      • Agreements about days or times of work – entitled employers
      • Agreements about days or times of work – legacy employers
      • Termination of an agreement about days or times of work
    • Employer payment obligations
      • Wage condition
      • Minimum payment guarantee
      • Hourly rate of pay guarantee
    • Agreements about annual leave
    • Protections
    • Disputes we cannot assist with
    • Applications to deal with a dispute
      • Who can make an application
      • Responding to an application
      • Objecting to an application
      • Discontinuing an application
    • Commission process
      • General information
      • Conferences & hearings
      • Procedural issues
    • Evidence
    • Outcomes
      • Contravening an order
      • Appeals
      • Role of the Court
    • Attachments
  • Modern Awards Review 2012
    • Introduction
      • Modern Awards Review 2012
  • Sir Richard Kirby Archives
    • Home
    • Sir Richard Kirby
    • About the Archives
    • Cases
      • Case
      • The Honourable Justice Henry Bournes Higgins (1851–1929)
    • Centenary
    • Exhibitions
      • Exhibition launch: The history of the Australian minimum wage
      • Guide – Opening Exhibition
      • International Industrial Dispute Resolution Conference
        • Speaker – Justice Alan Boulton AO
        • Speaker – Mr Arthur F Rosenfeld
        • Speaker – Mr Craig Smith
        • Speaker – Mr James Wilson
        • Speaker – Mr Kieran Mulvey
        • Speaker – Mr Peter Anderson
        • Speaker – Ms Ginette Brazeau
        • Speaker – Ms Nerine Kahn
        • Speaker – Ms Rita Donaghy CBE
        • Speaker – Ms Sharan Burrow
        • Speaker – Senator Guy Barnett
        • Speaker – The Hon. Julia Gillard
      • The Journey
        • Court
          • Early years
          • New court
            • Profile of Justice O'Connor
            • First registration of an industrial organisation
          • Judges & conciliators
          • The Boilermakers' Case
            • The dispute & appeals
        • Commission
          • Post Boilermakers 1956-1973
          • Hawke & Keating governments
            • Industrial Relations Court
          • Howard Government
        • Fair Work Australia
          • The Fair Work system
          • About Fair Work Australia
          • Transition
          • Fair Work timeline
      • The history of the Australian minimum wage
        • The Great Strikes
        • The first minimum wage: The Victorian minimum wage
        • The Harvester Decision
        • The impact of the Great Depression
        • Working it out: Cost of living versus capacity to pay
        • The removal of award rate discrimination
        • The wage explosion & economic crisis
        • The modern era: The development of a modern minimum wage
      • Treasures of the archives
        • Launch speech?Treasures of the Archives
        • 1. Professor Isaac
        • 2. Register of organisations
        • 3. Perlman letters
        • 4. Sir Richard Kirby photograph
        • 5. Oral history program
        • 6. AIRC sign
        • 7. Folder of wage decisions
        • 8. Centenary exhibition
        • 9. Women's exhibition poster
        • 10. Isaac letters
    • The modern era
    • Past Presidents
    • Past Members
      • Past Members 1956 to present
      • Past Members to 1956
  • Unfair dismissals benchbook
    • Overview of unfair dismissal
    • Glossary & naming conventions
    • Coverage for unfair dismissal
      • Who is protected from unfair dismissal?
      • People excluded from national unfair dismissal laws
        • Independent contractors
        • Labour hire workers
        • Vocational placements & volunteers
        • Public sector employment
      • Constitutional corporations
      • High income threshold
      • Modern award coverage
      • Application of an enterprise agreement
      • What is the minimum period of employment?
        • How do you calculate the minimum period of employment?
        • What is continuous service?
        • What is an excluded period?
      • Bankruptcy
      • Insolvency
    • What is dismissal?
      • When does a dismissal take effect?
      • Terminated at the employer's initiative
      • Forced resignation
      • Demotion
      • Contract for a specified period of time
      • Contract for a specified task
      • Contract for a specified season
      • Training arrangement
      • What is a transfer of employment?
      • Periods of service as a casual employee
      • What is a genuine redundancy?
        • Job no longer required due to changes in operational requirements
        • Consultation obligations
        • Redeployment
      • What is the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code?
    • What makes a dismissal unfair?
      • Valid reason relating to capacity or conduct
        • Capacity
        • Conduct
      • Notification of reason for dismissal
      • Opportunity to respond
      • Unreasonable refusal of a support person
      • Warnings – unsatisfactory performance
      • Size of employer's enterprise and human resources specialists
      • Other relevant matters
    • Making an application
      • Application fee
      • Timeframe for lodgment
      • Extension of time for lodging an application
      • Who is the employer?
      • Multiple actions
      • Discontinuing an application
    • Objecting to an application
    • Commission process
      • Conciliation
      • Hearings and conferences
      • Preparing for hearings and conferences
      • Representation by lawyers and paid agents
      • Rescheduling or adjourning matters
      • Bias
    • Remedies
      • Reinstatement
        • Order for reinstatement cannot be subject to conditions
        • Order to maintain continuity
        • Order to restore lost pay
      • Compensation
        • Calculating compensation
        • Mitigation
        • Remuneration
        • Other relevant matters
        • Compensation cap
        • Instalments
    • Dismissing an application
    • Evidence
    • Costs
      • Costs against representatives
      • Security for costs
    • Appeals
      • Staying decisions
    • Role of the Court
  • Waltzing Matilda and the Sunshine Harvester Factory
    • Introduction
    • The book
      • Book launch
    • The film
      • Film launch
    • Historical material
      • 38 Hour Week Wage Principle [1983]
      • 40 Hour Week Case [1947]
      • 44 Hour Week Case [1927]
      • Apprenticeship indentures
      • Australian Minimum Wage and fitter (trades) rate since 1906
      • Boot Trades Case
      • Careers in Bootmaking and Boot Repairing
      • Cattle Industry Case 1966
      • Commercial Printing Case [1936]
      • Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904
      • Cost of living newspaper articles from the early 1900s
      • Debates
      • Equal Pay Case 1969
      • Equal Pay Case 1972
      • Fruit Pickers Case
      • Gas Employees Case
      • Graph of Australian Minimum Wage since 1906
      • Harvester Case
      • Historic case judgments on the Fair Work Commission's website
      • Kingston's evidence
      • Linesmen's Case
      • Maternity Leave Case [1979]
      • Metal trades base level minimum wages [1967–2015]
      • Methods of wage adjustment
        • Establishing an Australian Minimum Wage 1907?1922
          • The origins of the Australian minimum wage
          • The 'needs' principle and 'capacity to pay'
          • Women's wages
          • First indexation decision
        • Quarterly indexation 1922–1953
        • The Great Depression 1931
        • Prosperity loadings 1937
        • World War II 1939–1945
        • The post-war period: 1953–1965 basic wage inquiries
        • The total wage 1966–1967
        • Removal of discrimination in award rates
        • Reintroduction of quarterly wage indexation 1975–1978
        • Six monthly wage indexation 1978–1981
        • Wage explosion 1981–1982
        • Reforming awards and work and management practices 1987–1991
        • Six monthly wage indexation 1983–1987
        • Enterprise bargaining and a minimum wage safety net 1991–1996
        • Statutory adjustments
        • The minimum wage in real terms
      • Mrs Beeton's cookbook
      • Paternity Leave Case [1990]
      • Personal/Carer's Leave Test Case [1995]
      • Piddington report
      • Re Bagshaw [1907]
      • Significant cases on the Fair Work Commission's website
      • Statistics for the purpose of comparison with the Australian minimum wage
      • The Amalgamated Society of Engineers v. The Adelaide Steam-ship Company Limited and Others
      • The Australian minimum wage from 1906
      • The Federated Marine Stewards and Pantrymen's Association v. The Commonwealth Steamship Owners' Association and Others
      • The Victorian minimum wage 1896
        • Legislative Council Second Reading Speech to the Factories and Shops Bill 1896
      • The first Award: 1906 Steam-ship Crew
      • 100 years of the minimum wage—Statistical comparison
    • Mrs Beeton's cookbook
    • Glossary
    • Related sites
    • Educational materials
  • AWRS First Findings report

Footer

  • Site map
  • Legal
  • Copyright
  • Accessibility

Coronavirus (COVID-19) information